That seems a reasonable thing to include.

Do you think I need to put out 0.33_06 and regress that or just slip
it into the 0.34 release?

David

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:19 AM, John
Peacock<john.peac...@havurah-software.org> wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
>> After I get 0.34 out and a good regression test between that and 0.33,
>> I expect that 0.34 will go into 5.10.1 and then we can get back to
>> further improvements.
>
> I just realized yesterday that it was not possible to install version.pm 0.77 
> on
> Perl 5.10.0 without a compiler (i.e. to use the pure Perl module).  It turns 
> out
> the fix was extremely small and should be applied to Module::Build's inline 
> code
> as well (see below).
>
> If it is too late for 0.34, just apply this for the next public M::B release; 
> it
> doesn't affect whatever goes into 5.10.1 (M::B will use the core code anyways)
> and it only affects modules which do weird things with eval and locale.
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
>
> === lib/Module/Build/Version.pm
> ==================================================================
> --- lib/Module/Build/Version.pm (revision 2627)
> +++ lib/Module/Build/Version.pm (local)
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@
>     no strict 'refs';
>     *{'version::stringify'} = \*version::vpp::stringify;
>     *{'version::(""'} = \*version::vpp::stringify;
> +    *{'version::new} = \*version::vpp::new;
>  }
>
>  # Preloaded methods go here.
>
>
>

Reply via email to