On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Gisle Aas<gi...@activestate.com> wrote:
> But "dotted-decimal" is just wrong.  If I take the decimal "1.04" and the
> decimal "1.10" and dot them I get "1.04.1.10" and that's not what you meant.

dotted-integer is technically wrong, too, since we're really talking
dotted-non-negative-integers

Or we could call them ISO 2145 versions

C.f.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_2145

Googling "dotted decimal",  "dot decimal" and "dotted integer" all
seem to give similar stuff.

But for what it's worth, perl56delta describes the new version
numbering scheme as "dotted integer".

-- David

Reply via email to