On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 2:40 PM, David Golden <xda...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Gabor Szabo <szab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am now trying to get Bugzilla packaged to CPAN and it is explicitely >> licensed >> under mozilla1.1 >> >> Would it be possible to add those two keys to the valid list of values >> of the license field? >> Software::License http://search.cpan.org/dist/Software-License/ >> already has them separated. > > Hi, Gabor. Just list it as "mozilla" or "open_source" for now. The > way licenses get handled will be revised when we release the CPAN Meta > 2.0 spec later this year. (And both Mozilla licenses are already > included separately in the valid list in the draft 2.0 spec).
That's what I did but I expect some arguments from the core Bugzilla developers and their lawyers. I'll use your point if needed. Thanks Gabor
