In an old thread dated October 9, with the subject "server config apr_table_t" there was some talk about this issue and it was mantioned that the server config structure is to be considered non-volatile. Did I get that right?
On 11/22/06, Christiaan Lamprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 11/22/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IPC adds complexity, and is of course slower than working > within-process. You'll need an shm segment, or something more > persistent like a DBM. You mentioned using that using the server config for the shared resources is ok. I gather that shm/dbm are other ways of doing the same thing. (e.g. SSL uses it for caching) but I can get away with using the server config instead..? > I asked the publisher about that just a few days ago. Apparently > we're too near to release for them to think offering previews is > worthwhile. I'm contemplating doing something off my own bat: > maybe accepting orders myself, and sending relevant PDFs in advance, > then the book when it's available. Well, see what works, I'll be waiting... Thanks Christiaan
