Wow, ap_send_interim_response is great! Thanks for pointing that out. I got it to work with apparent success by just reusing the ap_filter_t's reqeust_rec in my incoming filter, saving the status and status code, setting them for the interim call, and then restoring them afterwords. Does this sound like the right way to use ap_send_interim_response, or should I really be geenrating a new request_rec just for this response?
thanks, Charles On Feb 8, 2008 12:03 PM, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:46:18 -0500 > "Charles Fry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All right. I finally resolved this, and it ends up the code works just > > fine, it's just that the input filter wasn't set properly, but I > > didn't notice due to the spurious 103 I was observing due to my > > modification of http_protocol. Whew. > > Great. Saves thinking about whether I'd have anything useful to say. > > Are you using the (new) ap_send_interim_response API function, > or is the response embedded in your filter? > > -- > Nick Kew > > Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book > http://www.apachetutor.org/ >
