Instead of writing data in my handler can I create there a custom bucket, let the byterange filter split it properly and let the core filter call my custom read function?
On 26.02.2017 15:23, Nick Kew wrote: > On Sun, 2017-02-26 at 15:02 +0300, Basin Ilya wrote: > >> However, it's inefficient to serve huge virtual files this way when only a >> small part of such file requested. How to solve this? > > Unless your module can handle the byterange itself, you might > want to consider cacheing the generated file for the benefit > of future byterange requests. >
