On 05.12.2010 22:11, George J. Walsh wrote: > On Sun, 2010-12-05 at 21:14 +0100, Hardy Griech wrote: > >> gnutls has some advantages over openssl for my application which are >> really critical. So mod_gnutls is also critical! >> >> Hardy > > I was unsuccessful at getting mod_gnutls up and running a month or so > back, which resulted in my using openssl for TLS support. Haven't > experienced any problems with that to date, but am curious to learn what > you do not receive with openssl which might prove critical down the line > for us. Meantime, it would be great to have Paul's involvement once > again as the original author of mod_gnutls.
I have modified mod_gnutls to use pre shared keys. Modifications were quite simple. When everything is tested, I will make the small patch available and Paul will hopefully merge it into mod_gnutls. The other advantage of mod_gnutls over mod_ssl is, that maximum fragmentation length (embedded system!) in gnutls is really working as it is supposed to do. I had no success to make it working under openssl. Hardy _______________________________________________ Modules mailing list Modules@lists.outoforder.cc http://lists.outoforder.cc/mailman/listinfo/modules