In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Muir Sharnoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * and, just out of curiousity, what advantage does your module
> * have over a closure? it seems you have to do more work to get
> * the same effect.
>
> How so? I don't use closures that often so maybe I'm missing
> something, but it seems to me that there isn't any similarity
> at all. The purpose of my module is to save a few characters.
> Instead of:
> " some string @{[ xyz(abc) ]} "
>
> You have
> " some string $xyz{abc} "
okay, that makes sense. i usually don't write it that way so
i didn't think about that. i use string concatenation to force
scalar context anyway. i use closures a lot so they don't seem
strange to me, but that's just me.
" some string " . $xyz->(abc) . " ";
i think Kurt has already presuaded you to use Interpolation though. :)
--
brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org
please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
