--- Begin Message ---
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Johan
Vromans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest to go ahead with User::Identity and Mail::Identity and see
> how it works out. I'm convinced that Mark has done a lot of thinking
> about it, and I don't see any better names coming up anyway.
i disgree---it sounds like two similar modules are getting different
top-level namespaces here. if the common thing is Identity, that
concept should get pride of place in the name. I suspect the
actual data used to make the identity do not matter that much.
perhaps Mark should post some example code to show us what the
modules do.
--
brian d foy (one of many PAUSE admins), http://pause.perl.org
please send all messages back to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- End Message ---
