On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 05:34:52PM -0500, Casey West wrote: > It was Tuesday, February 25, 2003 when Kurt Starsinic took the soap box, saying: > : On Feb 25, Casey West wrote: > : > I'm writing a set of modules that deal with scripture (bible) > : > specifications and standards, as well as a few for interfacing with > : > things from the Sword project (http://www.crosswire.org/sword), and > : > I'm perplexed about a namespace. > : > > : > I want it to be short, something like > : > Religion::Christianity::Bible::Spec::GBF is not appealing. > : > > : > I'm think about a top level Bible::*. I know that there are other > : > folks who consider the bible to be something else entirely than a > : > Christian bible, so I'm also thinking along the lines of Scripture::*. > : > > : > Any thoughts would be welcome. > : > : I don't think that Religion:: is the right top-level namespace. > : The module doesn't process theological concepts, it processes text. > : I would suggest that you either put your modules under Text::GBF::, > : or under SWORD:: (if you're planning on submitting a lot of SWORD- > : related modules). > > Yes, lots under Sword, and there are several processors, not just GBF, > should they all go under Text::, or would a Text::[something here]:: > be more appropriate. Also, some of these formats are actually binary > in nature.
Perhaps Scripture::Bible:: would be a suitable root. Tim.
