On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:59:34 -0800, brian d foy <brian.d....@gmail.com>
wrote:
<AANLkTikn043kgPWjLX0w+FCikhixYiGDy=oz0fdt4...@mail.gmail.com>, Skye
Shaw <skye.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:17:59 -0700 brian d foy wrote:
> Should video be in the name somewhere, and which types of video
> timecodes does this module handle? Maybe a name would be
> Time::Video::SMTPE or something similar. :)
The problem with using Video/PAL/NTSC/SECAM is that "video", "PAL",
etc.. imply a specific frame rate/counting scheme (drop frame, for
example). My module handles any frame rate/counting scheme.
I have no knowledge about this subject, but you said "video" in your
description.
You're right. Looking at my subject and the module's docs I do use "video"
-in the non-frame rate sense. Time::Video::Timecode is probably a better
fit, I'll use that on my next release.
