On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:07:57PM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > WL is absolutely meaningless on first sight as a namespace. Expanding the > > acronym or adding a qualifier for what area it related to would be good. > > > > WL as a namespace on its own is terrible. > > Do you have a better suggestion?
Protocol::Wayland and then use the fact that perl can export symbols to avoid needing to reference fully qualified long names. See: http://p3rl.org/aliased http://p3rl.org/Exporter for two simple modules that'll help with that. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
