When I said "the latter did index a module", I meant that I'd checked both the email and the peek_perms to be sure of it. I stated it as a fact because it was a fact and known to me as a fact :P
Anyway, all seems caught up now, just 02packages on www.cpan.org took a bit longer than I'd expected and I was getting twitchy. On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 05:35:01PM -0400, David Golden wrote: > Did it actually index or did you get an email you didn't read perhaps with > one of those database lock errors? > > On Aug 7, 2016 4:52 PM, "Matt S Trout" <m...@shadowcat.co.uk> wrote: > > > I released two versions of App-opan - 0.001001 and 0.001002. The former > > didn't index any modules because I'm an idiot, and showed up on metacpan > > etc. fine. The latter did index a module because I'd fixed it, and then > > nothing has been seen of it anywhere since. > > > > -- > > Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a > > clue > > > > http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_ > > mst/ > > > > Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN > > commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team. > > -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
