On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 03:36:48AM +0100, Andreas Koenig wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 02:03:01 +0000, Matt S Trout <m...@shadowcat.co.uk> > >>>>> said: > > > I'm not sure what the procedure would be for when this happens, do we > > re-upload under a PAUSE user? Adopt first? Things depending on these > modules > > are really not happy right now, so I wonder if a NOMAINT user to re-upload > > under might be acceptable? > > > This is, er, not something I'd expected to happen. Thoughts welcome. > > I think it's preferrable if a real user would adopt them. Pseudouser ok > if not obviously recognizable as such. I see no benefit to have the > MAINT aspect in the username.
I prefer that. I was thinking a pseudouser to indicate ADOPTME type status and get it done -now- rather than after more downstream users have been impacted. -- Matt S Trout - Shadowcat Systems - Perl consulting with a commit bit and a clue http://shadowcat.co.uk/blog/matt-s-trout/ http://twitter.com/shadowcat_mst/ Email me now on mst (at) shadowcat.co.uk and let's chat about how our CPAN commercial support, training and consultancy packages could help your team.
