On Nov 18, 11:15 am, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW, I presume this configuration works, or is it still being set up? > > Suggest you use the following WSGI test script to verify what process > group and application group is being used.
Yes, the configuration is implemented and works fine. I've verified the process group and application group using your script and that gives the expected result. Is there a rationale for using StringIO by the way? I just use a list and return that. > That certainly helps, but at the same time means more work for you. > > I might suggest you have a look at Werkzeug. It doesn't mandate a > specific database adapter or ORM layer but still provides a lot of > useful infrastructure for constructing web applications so you aren't > doing everything from scratch. I am aware of the existence of Werkzeug. Thanks for the heads up nonetheless. There is a good possibility I will use some of its functionality in the future. I've looked at a lot of other "full featured" frameworks like Django, Pylons and web2py, but decided "rolling my own" would be the best choice in my situation. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=.
