Thanks Graham, I agree now that I understand it in more detail... - Pieter
On 24 mei, 00:31, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> wrote: > If you use embedded mode you could use: > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mpm_common.html#listenbacklog > > to set listen backlog to zero. I still don't believe it is a good idea > as you are likely going to reject a lot of requests. > > You could set it to some non zero small value, but still not sure how > desirable it is. You can at least play with the idea I guess. > > Graham > > On 24 May 2011 09:21, Pieter Ennes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Graham, > > > I see your point. > > > We have a situation where we want the server to give back an error > > straight away, so we can fail over to a different node entirely; when > > the connection hangs for a long period of time, this mechanism fails. > > But I could look into switching to embedded mode for this specific > > application, would there be a solution there? > > > - Pieter > > > On May 23, 11:28 am, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> To do it would mean having configuration options to set the listen > >> back log for the UNIX listener socket that a daemon process group > >> listens on, plus a configuration option to disable the back off and > >> reconnect when connection failures occur when connecting to the daemon > >> processes from the Apache child processes. > > >> Overall I cannot think of any good reason to do this though with the > >> result possibly being less stable/predictable behaviour. It possibly > >> would render useless the ability of daemon processes to be restarted > >> by touching the WSGI file as you would cause 503 all the time when you > >> do it. > > >> Can you now explain why you would want to do this? > > >> Graham > > >> On 23 May 2011 20:17, Pieter Ennes <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > That would be daemon mode primarily... > > >> > - Pieter > > >> > On 23 mei, 11:06, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Are you specifically talking about embedded mode or daemon mode? > > >> >> Graham > > >> >> On 23 May 2011 20:02, Pieter Ennes <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > Hi all, > > >> >> > I'm looking for a way to have mod_wsgi return a 503 response straight > >> >> > away whenever no process/thread is available, instead of having the > >> >> > incoming requests queue up first. Is there any way to do this? Based > >> >> > on the detailed description here: > > >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi/browse_thread/thread/706cff32a... > > >> >> > I'm not sure if this is currently possible. Can I file a feature > >> >> > request for this? > > >> >> > Thanks, > >> >> > - Pieter > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> >> > Groups "modwsgi" group. > >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> > [email protected]. > >> >> > For more options, visit this group > >> >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en. > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups "modwsgi" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected]. > >> > For more options, visit this group > >> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "modwsgi" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.
