Great, all looks good according to ldd. thanks, -Shawn
On Friday, August 31, 2012 11:40:52 PM UTC-4, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > That statement on size is likely from when mod_wsgi 1.0 was released > and for a 32 bit system, so grown marginally since and 64 bit could be > bigger also. > > The important thing is that it isn't in the MBs and ldd or other > appropriate command shows a dependency on a shared library for Python. > > Graham > > On 1 September 2012 00:54, Shawn <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > So I've built and installed python2.7 with --enabled-shared. Ive built > and > > installed mod_wsgi 3.3. The mod_wsgi docs state that if it compiled with > the > > python shared library the resultant mod_wsgi.so should come in under 256 > > kilobytes. Here is mine > > > > du -h /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_wsgi.so > > 396K /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_wsgi.so > > > > Should I be concerned about it being 140K larger or I am being crazy? > > > > thanks, > > -s.a > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "modwsgi" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/modwsgi/-/H0cWC2UCPeoJ. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]<javascript:>. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "modwsgi" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/modwsgi/-/vlA7pJjJTYsJ. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi?hl=en.
