> On 30 Sep 2016, at 7:59 PM, Konstantin Suvorov <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Some more research...
> If I run a fresh container with packaged mod_wsgi from my first post, I can 
> start httd with the following wsgi-test.conf:
> Listen 8080
> WSGIDaemonProcess example0verylongname processes=2 threads=2
> WSGIScriptAlias /test /wsgi/wsgi-test.wsgi
> WSGIProcessGroup example0verylongname
> <Directory /wsgi>
> Require all granted
> </Directory>
> Note verylong process name.
> 
> But this one gives segfault:
> Listen 8080
> WSGIDaemonProcess example.com processes=2 threads=2
> WSGIScriptAlias /test /wsgi/wsgi-test.wsgi
> WSGIProcessGroup example.com
> <Directory /wsgi>
> Require all granted
> </Directory>
> And more to say, if I revert config back to "example0verylongname" after 
> catching segfault, httpd will segfault with it too!!!
> 
> Also I've noted that if I strip ".com" from your example leaving only 
> "example" process name, it segfaults.
> If I use "example0" in your example, it starts.
> 
> Do you think it's possible to fix this? Or should I forget the idea of 
> running mod_wsgi with Alpine linux?

For now I would give up on Alpine Linux. Any advantages of using Alpine Linux 
with Docker are overblown.

For now just play with:

    https://github.com/GrahamDumpleton/mod_wsgi-docker

Graham

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"modwsgi" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/modwsgi.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to