+1. On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 3:20:32 PM UTC+1, Baptiste Mathus wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > (Didn't intend to release those two together, but overlooked to close the > staging repo before releasing the next one, so only one repo and I didn't > think that would be an issue, given in the end extra-enforcer-rules:1.0 has > no change. It's the last release just renamed for finally clarifying this > is actually usable as explained in the previous email). > > Staging repository: > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-1130/ > > 1. mojo-parent: > - > > https://github.com/mojohaus/mojo-parent/compare/mojo-parent-40...mojo-parent-50 > 2. extra-enforcer-rules: > 1. No change from 1.0-beta-9, as you can see > > https://github.com/mojohaus/extra-enforcer-rules/compare/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-beta-9...extra-enforcer-rules-1.0 > 2. (you could see I screwed up a few beta- releases after beta-9. > It was me getting back my credentials and mvn deploy issues ironed out > :-|) > > Please vote > [ ] +1 > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 > > *If nobody disagrees, I would like to leave this vote open slightly less > long than usual, say 24 hours so that I can push the button tomorrow > evening or so.* > > It's just to allow me to move forward on other tasks, given also the > specific case here, which I think requires less review than usually: an > internal artifact for us (mojo-parent), and a version bump without actual > content (extra-enforcer-rules). > > Thanks! > > -- Baptiste >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/55a9e665-0a36-42bc-b2db-c88361fe1543%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
