I don't question that. All I say is that the current implementation is not in line with the spec.
Or do you mean to say that the version containing an unknown qualifier is considered newer than a release version? Op zaterdag 8 oktober 2022 om 11:57:49 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]: > > > Op vrijdag 7 oktober 2022 om 21:53:50 UTC+2 schreef Andrzej Jarmoniuk: > >> >> Apparently, non-standard qualifiers aren't being considered as less >> mature than releases without any qualifiers, which as far as I know, >> conflicts with the version policy, which states that any qualified version >> should be deemed less mature. >> >> > this works as described in the javadoc: > https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/bff84bd634fd4cafe87f31ea155744095f6ecd1a/maven-artifact/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/artifact/versioning/ComparableVersion.java#L32-L62 > > and the proposal that describes this: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVENOLD/Versioning > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mojohaus-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/mojohaus-dev/8f5caf79-11ae-498f-bad5-cb03dfe94314n%40googlegroups.com.
