Use the right tool for the job - your javascript files aren't templates, so serve them as static files. The main benefit of serving static files is that the browser can cache them until they're next modified.
-Dan On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 6:24 PM Viktor Nacht <[email protected]> wrote: > For Mojolicious, are there any best practices or compelling arguments for > putting scripts in templates vs static files in the public directory? I do > plan on eventually using AssetPack to serve them combined and minified. > Just curious what most other people do. > > V > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Mojolicious" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mojolicious" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/mojolicious. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
