On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Andrew Ryan wrote: > OK so I admit, any time I see a patch which only removes code, I get a bit > suspicious. > > Actually I think the behavior of the code now is correct, although not > necessarily what you want, or what some people might expect. > > In our mon environment we sometimes had a hostgroup or three that needed to > be disabled for an extended period of time and we needed to make sure that > the disabling configuration 'stuck' even when the mon server was reset. We > used this feature of mon extensively. But I agree it may not be what you want.
I disagree. If you reset with the keepstate parameter, which sounds like what you want, hosts are still kept disabled... since disabled hosts are kept in the state file and loaded on reset if you want it to be. -- Erik I. Bolsų, Triangel Software AS | Skybert AS Tlf: 712 41 694 Mobil: 915 79 512 _______________________________________________ mon mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/mon
