Hi Teggy, Hi Manuel, thanks for the clarification!
In that case, Sjoerd's suggestion of copying the definition of SSZFMT (and possibly more if required) seems to be the best solution. Stefan On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:56:15PM +0200, Torsten Grust wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > thanks for your feedback. > > 'xmlshred' — or what it will soon become, rather — will be primarily > used in a context > where Pathfinder will generate SQL code only. Such setups consist of modules > 'buildtools' and 'pathfinder' only, no 'MonetDB'. > > Cheers, > --Teggy > > > On 9/10/07, Stefan Manegold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > > Since xmlshred is in the pathfinder tree (which inherently depends on > > MonetDB), and as long as there are no plans to distribute xmlshred > > separately and make it compile stand-alone, what't the problem of using > > monet_utils.h? id does not create any new dependency. > > -- > | Torsten "Teggy" Grust > | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- | Dr. Stefan Manegold | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | CWI, P.O.Box 94079 | http://www.cwi.nl/~manegold/ | | 1090 GB Amsterdam | Tel.: +31 (20) 592-4212 | | The Netherlands | Fax : +31 (20) 592-4312 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
