On Dec 11, 2007, at 18:25 , Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 11-12-2007 18:23:06 +0100, Ying Zhang wrote: >>> Hmmm, while that is given how the mjclient script looks like a bit >>> of a >>> lost case, I understand the idea. I still don't like it being >>> tested >>> via --help or --version simply because that means the side effect of >>> the >>> test is what actually is to be tested here. >>> >> >> then, how about just start mclient without any options? it will >> complain that no language option is given. would that be a >> sufficient >> indication that mclient can be started at all? > > You missed a very vital "j".
you are right :( > But look at the script and you will know > like me that what is actually tested is already tested elsewhere, and > that the test perceives to test something that is actually not tested > (e.g. the mjclient script can still be tad broken, even though testing > things it works). > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Monetdb-developers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
