On 07-03-2009 23:09:13 +0100, Stefan de Konink wrote: > >> The code was added to have last_id support within the ODBC interface; > >> required for phpBB compatibility. > > > > Weird, ODBC already knows it, and more reliable, via the response of > > Q_UPDATE. I think it was already implemented in ODBC even? It's > > available in mapilib, using mapi_get_last_id. > > mapi_get_last_id is not used in the odbc sources. And Q_UPDATE denotes: > > case Q_UPDATE: /* Q_UPDATE */ > /* result count generating query */
Yes, but for ODBC it was extended also to return the generated number of a sequence (key) as second field. Last week I implemented the use of this field in JDBC. > So I don't know if you were thinking about something else. I am still > fighting with cvs to get my patches in diff -u format. Hence the > previous off by one screwup. I'm pretty sure the information is already there, and that ODBC should use that information instead of a separate query which is prone to transaction race conditions and more. I was under the impression the extra information was added because ODBC needed it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
