Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 09-05-2009 11:43:14 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote: >> Fabian Groffen wrote: >>> On 08-05-2009 19:54:38 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote: >>>> As already found in the news SHA-1 is advised to migrated off by 2010. I >>>> would suggest SHA-2 in protocol 9. >>> Which one of the SHA-2 family then? And is it really that important >>> given that the store is still protected by a vaultkey? >> SHA-256; >> >> Is it important? For obvious reasons you choose not to use SHA-0 or MD5 >> for prototol 9. Within that logic SHA-1 is actively being broken; thus I >> would follow an advisory not to incorporate them in new software. > > Which is ok with me, but just makes it a bad initial choice from my > side, since this change will not be "convertable" from one to another. > Not a problem for releases, but it is a problem for people depending on > trunk at the moment ;) > Perhaps we should make use of this and allow the DBA to configure what No. the options for the DBA should be kept to a minimum. Go for the solution that will work for the next few years. Trunk users at some point should migrate through dump/restore, which can be used for passwords refresh requirements as well.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
