On 2010-02-15 09:57, Stefan Manegold wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 09:21:34PM +0100, Martin Kersten wrote: >> Sjoerd Mullender wrote: >>> I am quite unhappy with the names BATpreload, BATpreload_, and >>> _BATpreload. I really don't like names that differ only by an initial >>> or final _. I would much rather see more descriptive names. >>> BATpreload_ is now more an interface to give advice to the underlying >>> system about how the BAT is going to be accessed in the near future, and >>> _BATpreload is telling the underlying system that you're done with >>> accessing the BAT according to the advice given. Names such as >>> BATaccessadvice/BATendaccessadvice, though longer, are more descriptive. >>> >>> I have seen some checkins fixing the incorrect use of BATpreload_ and >>> _BATpreload, proofing my point. >>> >>> Now we still have a chance to fix this. >>> >> I fully agree, but did not had the trigger to change it.... > > I also more than agree --- what about > BATaccessBegin() & BATaccessEnd() ? > > If noone else is "faster", I could apply the chnages later today ...
That's good. What about BATpreload (without _)? -- Sjoerd Mullender
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
