Hi Rémy, On 20-09-2011 14:25:28 +0200, Rémy Chibois wrote: > > Aren't the version numbers missing from the package names? > > There's a "version" just under the Portfile "name", currently "11.5.1" > (Portfile has been updated since my first post ;) ). > > Would you prefer a different naming/versioning scheme ?
Not really. I was just wondering. As long as it's logical for a MacPorts user, I'm happy with it. > > The monetdb5-server package just adds an auto-startup entry, right? It > > doesn't install anything. Is this regular practice for MacPorts? > > I started up with another database's Portfile as an example and collected > what I thought to be best practices from a representative set of ports. Ok, that's usually a good approach ;) > > At this time, we don't have the resources to maintain this, but we > > encourage getting these into MacPorts proper. We would appreciate if > > you would take maintainership for this, and update the Portfiles as > > necessary for newer releases. > > I'd be glad to submit it and maintain it. > > Any remarks (naming, versioning, description, whatever…) before I proceed ? Nope, just let us know how it goes! Thanks again
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
