On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:00:59AM +0200, Martin Kersten wrote: > > > On 7/18/12 10:53 AM, Stefan Manegold wrote: > > Just wondering ... (and trying to learn): > > >> command batcalc.@2( l:bat[:oid,:@1], r:@1) :bat[:oid,:bit] > >> address MTIMEbat_@1_@3_cst; > >> -command batcalc.@2( l:bat[:void,:@1], r:@1) :bat[:void,:bit] > >> +command batcalc.@2(r:@1, l:bat[:oid,:@1]) :bat[:oid,:bit] > > > > Is the above signature change (swapping left & right operand) intended? > > If so, what is the reason for it? > signatures indicated different code paths, most likely never used. > -cst-Type versus -Type-cst
I see. Thanks! What about the (possibly redundant?) isnil-signatures? Stefan > >> address MTIMEbat_@1_cst_@3 > >> comment "Compare a bat of @1 against a singleton"; -- | Stefan.Manegold @ CWI.nl | DB Architectures (INS1) | | http://CWI.nl/~manegold/ | Science Park 123 (L321) | | Tel.: +31 (0)20 592-4212 | 1098 XG Amsterdam (NL) | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Monetdb-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/monetdb-developers
