>
> Hi Steve,
> a quick diagram of the query flow might help.
> I didn't get the picture of your setup to be able to answer.
>
----------------
This example you gave:
* local ok, sock = pcall(connect, host, 80, 0) if ok then
sock:send('GET / HTTP/1.0\r\n' .. 'Host: ' .. host ..
'\r\n\r\n') local reply = sock:recv() sock:close()*
* -- now you can use reply*
* end*
- Would a user be able to sniff that connection, reason i ask is because in
php (a old version) i use to use fopen and go to a remote host and i
believe the user was able to "sniff" what site was being able to connect.
--------------------------------------------------------
>
> I plan to create a minimalistic, embeddable Javascript engine to serve as
> a scripting engine,
> and yes the idea is to have it small and fast. Initially, it will
> implement only a subset of
> Javascript standard plus interfaces needed for backend. That will
> definitely be smaller then Lua.
> File and socket IO, DB and subprocess interfaces seem like a good
> foundation.
>
> Then i vote for the javascript engine :-D
Is the javascript engine in the works already?
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"mongoose-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mongoose-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
