The problem is definetly not IO related (And no other software I know has 
such a high CPU load transferring data from a file to a socket).

A short analysis of the problem:

in transfer_file_data() read is called to read data from the file to a 
buffer (0.29% of the total CPU instructions). Then ns_send() is called. 
Here the buffer is copied to another buffer (59.27% CPU instructions in 
memcpy). send() is called by ns_write_to_socket() and uses 0.49% of the CPU 
instructions. So the real problem is not reading from the file or writing 
to the socket, but the internal copy of the buffer in ns_send(). If there 
would be a way not to copy every byte of the file internaly before sending, 
the CPU load should be smaller (about 60%, which would be better by far). 

Am Mittwoch, 17. September 2014 09:54:11 UTC+2 schrieb Sergey Lyubka:
>
> Well if that is memcpy, then I don't find it surprising.
> Server is mostly doing data copying, reading from file and copying to the 
> socket.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Marcel Wirtz <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Yes
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "mongoose-users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mongoose-users.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"mongoose-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mongoose-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to