On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > snacktime <[email protected]> wrote: >> Interested in some feeback on this (does it sound right?), or maybe >> this might be of interest to others. > > Hi Chris, > > I think you meant to post this to the [email protected] > list, not [email protected] :> > Yes, not sure how that got mixed up...
> > That's "8 way xeon" _before_ hyperthreading, right? Which family of > Xeons are you using, the Pentium4-based crap or the awesome new ones? > Two quad core Nehalems on each server. > How much memory is each Unicorn worker using for your app? > Undoubtedly this is lower then it will be under a real load, but under our load tests they stabilize at around 160mb. > Do you have actual performance numbers you're able to share? > Mean/median request times/rates would be very useful. If your requests > run very quickly, you may be limited by contention with the accept() > syscall on the listen socket, too. > I had two different types of requests to test that I did in varying combinations. One takes on average 600ms, and the other 40ms. 98% of our requests will be the faster one. Deviations were really low. > I assume you're using nginx as the proxy, is this with Unix domain > sockets or TCP sockets? Unix domain sockets should give a small > performance over TCP if it's all on the same box. > Yes nginx with domain sockets. Chris _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
