Pierre <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also, I > > can not recommend HAProxy unless you're certain all your clients are on > > a LAN and can be trusted to never trickle uploads nor reading large > > responses. > > While I understand that uploads are very complicated to handle on the > stack (even nginx can be confused at upload sometimes), HAProxy proved > it was very good at managing tons of connections and high volume > traffic from the Internet. All the more so as it allows a very high > level of redundancy at a very small cost that cannot be achieved > simply otherwise. Do you have any pointers about your worrying > non-recommendation of HAProxy ?
On a related note, LWN has a new article[1] explaining the large body POST problem (more than a year since Slowloris, and ~3 years after the largely-unknown david[2]). [1] http://lwn.net/Articles/418017/ (subscribers) http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/418017/1e63e408f34b5d68/ (non-subscribers) [2] http://git.bogomips.org/cgit/david.git -- Eric Wong _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
