> unicorn isn't for cases where > you're cramming many apps on one box and trying to squeak by on memory > usage.
Thanks. The discussion helped a lot. ----- Original Message ----- > From: Eric Wong <[email protected]> > To: unicorn list <[email protected]> > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:26 AM > Subject: Re: Unicorn on shared apps platform > > Hongli Lai <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Amol Dev <[email protected]> wrote: >> > We are hosting multiple Rails applications on same server and using >> > Passenger + Apache. I can see Unicorn be useful for seamless >> > deploys, few questions running it on Rails platform with 50+ rails >> > apps: > >> Rainbows! is designed for a reverse proxy setup > > That's not true, Rainbows! was designed to serve clients directly. > On the other hand, I do not know if anybody uses Rainbows! that way > (or at all in production). > > Anyways everything else is accurate. unicorn isn't for cases where > you're cramming many apps on one box and trying to squeak by on memory > usage. > _______________________________________________ > Unicorn mailing list - [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn > Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying > _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
