Thank you for your answer Eric. > Using Rack::Timeout with Rainbows! instead of unicorn is probably a > better idea.
99% of the requests are fast and can be served far below 300 ms. Only a few type of requests need to stream lots of data. Do you really think that unicorn isn't a good choice in this case and I should consider switching to something else (Rack::Timeout + Rainbows!, Puma or whatever) just for the sake of that 1%? u. _______________________________________________ Unicorn mailing list - [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
