Sam Saffron <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am spawning sidekiqs from the master process so I share memory
> better, added this patch
>
> https://github.com/discourse/discourse/commit/4aaedb82d09d53159a99c3c94c0232c3cf5b0725
> Thing is I need to be in the master thread for both checks and
> spawning cause of this https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9751
I'll try to take a look at that, soon[1]
> Is there a cleaner way to hook in?
Not really. I can't promise no changes, but at least you told us about
it.
I don't want to encourage apps written specifically for unicorn and
defeating the point of Rack, either; but I don't imagine unicorn
changing much[2] until Rack 2.0 (if that ever happens?)
[1] - Most of my energy is devoted public-inbox.org right now.
With the imminent death of the Rubyforge lists,
Free Software extremist-console-junkies like me need
to keep distributed communication alive and usable to
non-GUI users.
[2] - Obvious the mailing list will change :P
And probably some wankery in providing an nginx alternative
via yahns[3], but this won't change unicorn itself.
[3] - allowing for lazy buffering on streaming output
and selectively handling MT-safe endpoints yahns,
while proxying non-MT-safe endpoints to unicorn...
_______________________________________________
Unicorn mailing list - [email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-unicorn
Do not quote signatures (like this one) or top post when replying
