On 2006-07-16 19:51:52 -0700, Daniel Burkes wrote:
> I am considering using Mongrel and I have read this list pretty
> extensively. I know that the Apache/mod_proxy_balancer/mongrel
> approach is the preferred one right now, with Apache serving the
> static content via mod_rewrite and such. However, in my hardware
> arsenal, I already have an old and trusty LocalDirector, which I
> would be inclined to at least try first as a substitute for Apache/
> mod_proxy_balancer. The biggest potential downside that I can see is
> that, in such a setup, mongrel would be serving static files as well
> as the dynamic Rails parts.
>
> My biggest question is, how recommended (or scorned) is having
> mongrel serve the static parts? A secondary question is, has anyone
> used mongrel clusters behind a LocalDirector?
you could define an asset host in your environment and make this asset
host a lighttpd or apache.
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
_______________________________________________
Mongrel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
