> Just curious, if you are really need the "performance" for static > files, why not use an asset_host ? i haven't personally used it, nor > do I fully know what it does, but on a cursory, half-hazard glance, it > appears you can serve up content from another web server (lightty, > apache, etc.) here for all your other stuff: > > http://asset.yourapp.com/images/zed_rules.gif > > just tossin' it out there....
Because sometimes you work with people who aren't good about using the various _tag method that make this work... heh. but yeah, it would help. > > On 8/3/06, Thomas Lockney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 8/3/06, Sunder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Okay. So send file is bad and has been removed. Correct me if Iam wrong , >>> but if you have apache installed and proxying through it, you dont really >>> need sendfile . is that assumption correct? >> >> It depends on how you set up the proxy. In general, no, everything >> will go through mongrel, you would have to either explicitly map only >> certain paths to mongrel (for anything that's not static) or >> explicitly exclude things that are static (can't recall how or even if >> this is possible with mod_proxy using filetypes, but you can always >> use mod_rewrite to do more complicated stuff). >> >> Thomas >> _______________________________________________ >> Mongrel-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users >> > > > -- > Charles Brian Quinn > self-promotion: www.seebq.com > highgroove studios: www.highgroove.com > slingshot hosting: www.slingshothosting.com > _______________________________________________ > Mongrel-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users > _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
