On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 10:28 -0700, Joe Ruby wrote: > Z-Man, > > DHH recently said: > > "And [_why's] latest work on sandbox looks stellar. > Making it drop-dead easy to run multiple Rails > applications in the same Mongrel process without > conflicts. Thumbs up to both him and Matz for getting > Sandbox on track for inclusion with the next Ruby > release." > Oh I didn't know he'd gotten it that together. Nice.
Now if Matz could just be bothered to fix those memory leaks and help get rid of the 1024 file limit I think I'd be one happy fellow. :-) > Does that mean what I think it means - that one or > more Mongrel processes may one day be able to serve > multiple Rails apps? Or something wacky like that? > Yep, well for _why it's at least to run multiple separated camping apps, but Rails is the holy grail for sure. Not sure how incredibly smart and/or stupid this will be but man it'd sure make a few people's day. > Thanks, > Joe Ruby > MUDCRAP-CE ^^^^^^ Hey, I don't remember you at the last course... -- Zed A. Shaw, MUDCRAP-CE Master Black Belt Sifu http://www.zedshaw.com/ http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/ http://www.lingr.com/room/3yXhqKbfPy8 -- Come get help. _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
