Ahh good stuff - cheers for the tip about camping! I took a brief look at the cas server, and you guys have implemented with mongrel (and others) by subclassing from what I can see? What is it that camping does for you by the way (in the context of cas- server)? (apologies for the stupid question but ive never used camping or heard of it lol)
Cheers all Tim On 24 Jul 2007, at 16:39, Matt Zukowski wrote: > I'd strongly recommend using Camping over Rails. We wrote a similar > application (RubyCAS-Server -- the CAS protocol uses conversational > HTTP), and Camping was definitely the way to go. The main problem with > Rails is that it's not asynchronous. Rails can't talk and listen at > the > same time, at least not within the same transaction. You might be able > to get around this, but you'll probably find yourself doing all > kinds of > gymnastics. Camping doesn't have this problem. It's much better suited > for these kinds of faceless apps anyway, since it's not weighed > down by > all the UI niceties you get with Rails. _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
