Luis Lavena wrote: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Anton Trapp <tmp...@allproducts.info> > wrote: >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `run' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/command.rb:212:in >> `run' >> /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/mongrel_rails:281 >> /usr/bin/mongrel_rails:19:in `load' >> /usr/bin/mongrel_rails:19 >> >> Any ideas? alternatives? >> > > If you're mentioning hundred of megabytes it might be possible that > the Ruby instance is not able to handle the file properly. > > Would be great if you can isolate this to a real minimum mongrel > handler example instead of a Rails application. > > I had successfully uploaded big files with mongrel, but honestly never > tried to upload 200mb or similar because will be suboptimal. > > -- > Luis Lavena > AREA 17 > - > Perfection in design is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, > but rather when there is nothing more to take away. > Antoine de Saint-Exupé²¹
yaa luis i am sending form with mutipart true option like <%= form_tag ({:action => 'uploadFile'},:multipart => true) %> -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list Mongrel-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users