Loic, I think it should follow the html5's trend closely.
and we(our comapy) will continue to work on monserver project, some features may be useful to you later. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Mark Marsella <[email protected]>wrote: > Mongrel2 isn't a language so pep is overkill. I think Mongrel should be > kept small and work should be focused on optimising and resolving issues, > rather than adding loads of new features. As long as it can take http hand > it to zmq then it's done it's job, and can be extended that way. > > Mark > > > On Tuesday, May 15, 2012, Loic d'Anterroches wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> as Zed is getting more fun writing books than coding at the moment, we >> happy users and developers of/around Mongrel2 need to find a way forward. >> >> In my personal/company case, Mongrel2 is a core part of my work, this is >> why I need it to succeed. >> >> Practically, this means that: >> >> - I can setup a dedicated server for the project, I can take care of the >> sysadmin and let trusted users "deploy" on it. >> - I can put money where my mouth is to support the development. >> >> The second part is of course how to coordinate and how to select what >> goes in Mongrel2 and what stays out. Maybe we can follow the Python PEP >> approach for the parts requiring a bit of discussion. This is working >> very well. >> >> In any cases, you can count on me to support the project for the years >> to come and I am sure that after a while, Zed will come back to have fun >> with the project. >> >> loïc >> > -- Nothing is impossible.
