> Jason,
>
> I've found that 16 limit in the code. I just don't agree with the behavior
> of
> closing the connection if the limit is reached. I think mongrel2 could
> just
> stop receiving from handler if the limit is reached.


That would means filling memory (the one controlled by the zeromq thread)
without control.

I think we should put more enphasis on the point that this 'buffer ring
limit' is required to overcome zeromq limits/behaviour


-- 
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it

Reply via email to