> Hi all, > > Just some random thoughts about Mongrel2 > > To my understanding, Mongrel2 has many similarities with wsgi architecture > and uWSGI container. > > - Mongrel2 speaks ZeroMQ, uWSGI speaks wsgi > - Mongrel2 has N:M Messaging Pattern, uWSGI has something different > called > FastRouter to balance/multicast traffic to different clusters/workers > - Mongrel2 is kinda like a container, uWSGI also supports python, RoR, > php, Erlang, etc. > > But uWSGI has many interesting features like Zerg mode for auto scaling, > Emperor mode, cluster, etc. uwsgi the messaging protocol is not only a > wrapper for http but also a cluster control protocol. > > What do you guys think about uWSGI vs Mongrel2? Could these two inspire > each other? >
Generally uWSGI and mongrel2 are used together, so a "comparison" is pretty "strange": http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Mongrel2.html some of the external component of uWSGI may overlap with mongrel2, but no-one works in the same way (there was an attempt called 'blastbeat' last year, but it is currently abandoned). So (at least for me) mongrel2 working way is pretty unique (for production-server) and a very interesting combo with uWSGI (i know of at least 2 big sites using it for PSGI apps) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it
