On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Justin Karneges <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I understand it, ZeroMQ is protocol-compatible across 2.x, 3.x, and > 4.x, with the exception that some early versions in the 3.x series were > incompatible (later versions are okay though). So, it should not be > necessary to modify Mongrel2 in order to use handlers written with libzmq 3 > or 4. But I have not personally tested this. > I just did. A couple of smoke tests make it look like it works, and my understanding is that since the 3.x disaster, ZeroMQ the project cares much more about backwards compatibility. There's a pull request here: https://github.com/zedshaw/mongrel2/pull/195 that will let you build against 4 out of the box. > > On 09/28/2013 02:33 AM, Laurent Alebarde wrote: > > Will Mongrel2 stick on libzmq 2 ? > > Can I have Mongrel2 with libzmq2 and besides libzmq3 or 4 work on the same > node ? In which conditions ? > To be more clear, can I have : > > Web ----- FireWall ----- Mongrel2 ----- 80, 21 ----- web front-end in a > jail > | |? > |-----?----------|--- 9000 ------ libzmq > 3/4 application server in another jail > > What are the plans and objectives for Mongrel2 (3 commits in 2013) ? > > Cheers, > > > Laurent > > Le 28/09/2013 05:51, Jason M. Miller a écrit : > > I'm pretty sure we are using the 2.x API so a 3.x to 4.x migration might not > be helpful. > On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:28 AM, William MARTIN wrote: > > > Hi, > > ZMQ have started their release cycle for the 4.x version. > Does anyone have try to migrate mongrel2 to this version ? > > I have ask on the ZMQ mailing-list for migratation notes from 3.x to 4.x > version. > > William > > > > -- ----------------------- | Henry Finucane | (510) 473-7148 -----------------------
