I have only browsed through the patch and it looks fine by me, although I'm not quite sure what is going on with the Event.state_map bit-flicking :-) Since you use a long long (could uint64_t be used instead?) does this mean that there are only room for 64 failed/ passed events? It should be more than enough but should maybe be documented (if I'm right). Anyway here's my +1 for accepting the patch.

On 2. sep. 2005, at 23.02, Martin Pala wrote:

Argh!!! Fixed attachment - it contained the vi swap ... sorry, i definitely need some sleep :)


Martin Pala wrote:

Ugh ... forgotten attachment
Martin Pala wrote:

Hi,

here is the event ratio patch updated for current cvs version and extended by the documentation.

May i sync it to cvs?

Martin




<event_ratio_20050902.patch>
_______________________________________________
monit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev


--
Jan-Henrik Haukeland
Mobil +47 97141255

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
monit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-dev

Reply via email to