Martin Pala schrieb:
Monit supports the dependency for such situations (the 'depends on'
statement).
I can't understand how the dependency should help in such a case?
If I know right, monit will not wait for dependent files.
We had a discussion about this 2 years ago, see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/monit-general/2005-11/msg00049.html.
Claus
Currently there is just soft dependency, hard dependency option is
planned.
Martin
MosheC wrote:
Thanks.
The workaround is not enough in general. It is not always a case of
starting
a service. For example, I check files and directories that are
created and
initialized by processes yet to be invoked and they might depend on some
other factors. I would like the checks to start only in , let's say, 10
cycles.
Moshe
Martin Pala wrote:
If monit is starting the process, then it expects that the next
monitoring cycle will be the service running otherwise it reports
error.
This behavior cannot be changed currently, but i added the todo item
for
it:
http://www.tildeslash.com/monit/doc/next.php#38
As a workaround you can set your monitoring cycle so, that the
service will have time enough to start.
Martin
MosheC wrote:
With "every N cycles" we can lower the test frequency.
Is it possible to only delay the first test for a number of cycles and
then
continue normally or possibly delay only the alerts.
I have a lot of alerts when I start monit that are a result of the new
processes being invoked by monit. It is just noise. I would like to
get
alerts only after I have reached "steady state" and then the alerts
will
really mean something "bad" happened.
Moshe
--
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
--
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
--
To unsubscribe:
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/monit-general
