On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:10:21 +0200 Roland Giesler <roland@greentree.systems> wrote:
> True, but if monit doesn't start if the file is not there, then > testing for the presence of the file and then attempting to execute > it if it exists seems to be the only way to proceed, not? Yes, but my question was: Why does monit refuse to start here? I'd expect it to start and just fail this single test. For testing mode, maybe emit a warning that the program cannot be found (and the test will thus fail). But refusing to start the daemon in the first place because just one check cannot be executed is somewhat overreacting from my point of view. cu Gerrit
