https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643377
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643377#c4 Kornél Pál <kornel...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kornel...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Kornél Pál <kornel...@gmail.com> 2010-10-03 17:19:09 UTC --- I've had a look at the limitations and believe that adding special support to the AOT compiler for System.Collections.Generic.Comparer<T> and System.Collections.Generic.EqualityComparer<T> would be reasonable. The logic implemented by their static constructors is so simple that the AOT compiler could easily determine if another generic instantiation of the helper class is required to be AOT compiled. This would not add much overhead to the AOT compiler either since type of T has to be known anyway so ony the name of these two comparer classes should be matched. Note that the documentation is somehow contradicts itself on whether Type.GetType is supported and I don't know whether MakeGenericType is supported on types that were actually compiled AOT. Even if the entire static constructor for these two comparers needed to be implemented in the AOT compiler I still belive that it was reasonable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ mono-bugs maillist - mono-bugs@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-bugs