Hello Ben, > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Maurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:44 PM > > * I think it would make sense to have mono --daemon or > something. > `mono' does not use libmono.so, it statically links > to libmono. > This has a huge performance advantage. By linking to > libmono we > experience two disadvantages: 1) we have to deal with the > performance problem since libmono is shared and must have PIC > code, which is slower, 2) if somebody runs the "real" mono, we > end up having two versions of our code loaded into > memory. This > is bad as it uses up more physical ram and costs extra disk > seeks. This would also solve:
This makes sense to me. Even better might be the managed solution which Rafael spoke about in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.mono.devel/10778 and which Miguel is trying to do now. This should run on most systems which support Mono.Unix, but I haven't found a solution for the managed fork problem. > * If we keep this around, can we rename the directory to > `service-deamon' or something. The `mono' at the beginning of > `monodoc' is messing up bash completion ;-(. Feel free to rename it. Joerg. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
